Solve the problem

Internet Advertising and Your Brain (A)

Imagine that your first job after business school is as the main marketing person for a fairly young company (started by the usual, a friend of a friend…). This company supports a travel Web site that specializes in extreme sports” (e.g., skiing off cliffs, riding mountain bikes from great heights into large air bags, as well as the more traditional” bungee jumping and skydiving). The target audience is the current profile of users, that is, men in their 20s (though the percentages of women and older thrill-seekers are growing). This group of customers is coincidentally also highly likely to be wired”; thus, advertising online is expected to be effective at reaching this audience. It is your responsibility as the Extreme Marketer to conduct tests to assess the ROI effectiveness of your company’s online advertisements. At the moment, you’ve created two variations of a banner ad inviting browsers to your Web site and you’re trying to choose between the twowhich is most likely to attract these guys to click onto your site to learn more about your vacation packages and then possibly purchase one? One of the ad banners your creative staff has de veloped is depicted in vivid colors, with captivating graphics that attempt to illustrate the possible thrills, such as a photo with a view of skiers at the top of a mountain shot from their delivery helicopter, or a photo of a sky diver in midair taken by a skydiving photographer. This ad format offers very little by way of informative content, such as details about the logistics of the trips, locations, lengths of stay, price, and so on. This ad is analogous to what is traditionally called the beauty” shot in adver tising production (a televised or still photo shot that shows the car or the jar of peanut butter without mentioning miles per gallon or caloric content). Thus, let’s call this version of the possible banner ad beauty.” Another banner ad has been prepared that appears somewhat less colorful and less pictorial in style, but which contains more detailed information about the extreme sports outings you are hoping to encourage the viewers to purchase. Given its greater information content, let’s call this version of the banner ad info.” You could just run a little study at this point. You could purchase banner ad space on your usual business relationship Web sites, randomly assigning half of those sites your beauty ad, and half your info ad. Then you would sit back and count over some duration (such as the next two weeks) the number of click-throughs you achieved with the one ad format versus the other, and conclude that the banner ad with the greater draw should be the one with which your firm proceeds. However, you have done your homework and are aware of some secondary data from eye-tracking studies. These studies insert small cameras into PC screens that monitor where the PC user is looking. The results suggest that placing the banner ad on some locations on the screen may be more effective than others. For example, one theory is that the brain processes whatever is in the right of a person’s visual field in the left half of the brain, and stimuli in the left part of a person’s visual field is processed in the right-brain hemisphere. Research conducted by physiological psychologists suggests that the left brain processes analytical features and verbal descriptions most effectively, whereas the right brain processes pictures and holistic impressions better. The info ad is verbal and offers many facts that readers could use to analyze and assess their interest, and the beauty ad is mostly graphics and leaves a holistic impression of the thrill-seeking vacation. Thus, you’re beginning to think that perhaps the info ad would be best understood and most persuasive if it were processed by a viewer’s left brain, which would dictate placing it on the right side of a Web page. In contrast, the beauty ad might be better understood and more persuasive if it were processed by a viewer’s right brain, which means placing the banner ad on the left side of the viewer’s screen. See Figure below. So now the Internet advertising study you’ve created is somewhat more complicated. There are two factors, rather than just one: the advertising type (beauty or info) and the banner placement (left or right). Your expectations are that the ad is most likely to be effective (measured for the moment by the number of click throughs it achieves) if the beauty ad is placed to the left or the info ad is placed to the right. However, you create  all possible combinations because, after all, your hypothesis about which ad should do better where” is in fact just a hypothesis. Thus, although each Web traveler sees only one ad, there are four ad variations: beauty on the left, beauty on the right, info on the left, and info on the right. You buy your ad space at your usual supplier Web sites, and you randomly assign one of the four ads to each of those locations. You determine how long you will wait (for example, two weeks) before counting the results.


What kind of design has been described?

How might you improve upon what has been

proposed?

 What are the (null) hypotheses that will be tested

using this design?

 What method(s) will you use to analyze the resulting

data that you obtain?

What strategic questions might supplement your

approach to investigating these issues?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *