Choose a global organizational leader who demonstrated how a high level of ethic

Choose a global organizational leader who demonstrated how a high level of ethical communication via social media technologies have worked best at building trust with virtual stakeholders.
Identify a global leader who has demonstrated a pattern of ethical social media communication.
Now, select a leader who has not developed a reputation for high levels of trust or ethics through social media communication.
Compare and contrast the two leaders and include a step-by-step process of how global cultural differences may have an impact on a leader’s ability to build trust with virtual stakeholders.
Requirements: Your submission should be 4-6-pages in length (not including title or reference pages) and be formatted according to the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.). Be sure to discuss and reference concepts taken from the course reading material and relevant research. You must include a minimum of 4-6 credible, academic or professional references.
Below is the rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment, including submission length and all assignment components/questions addressed.
8 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
4 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
20 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of leadership ethics or transparency; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
16 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
12 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
8 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
15 to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
12 to >9.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
9 to >6.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
6 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples
10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Cites and integrates at least 4 credible sources. Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.
8 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Cites and integrates 3 credible sources. Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Cites and integrates 2 credible sources. Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.
4 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Cites and integrates less than 2 credible sources. Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as detailed in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.
8 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as detailed in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.
4 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style.
10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than one significant error.
8 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than two to three significant errors.
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with four to five significant errors.
4 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with more than five significant errors.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.